Lifestyle

An Alarming Number Of Americans Can’t Name One First Amendment Right

The First Amendment is what sets the United States apart from the rest of the world, but an alarming number of Americans cannot name a single right it guarantees.

The Freedom Forum Institute, the education and outreach partner of the Freedom Forum and the Newseum, surveyed 1,009 Americans about their “familiarity with and attitudes toward the First Amendment.” And while 74% of respondents supported the rights guaranteed under the First Amendment, nearly half of them could not name a single one of those rights:

About one-third of respondents (36%) could name one freedom, but only 3% could name four or five freedoms. Only one respondent could name all five correctly. Two-fifth of respondents could not recall any (40%).

The five freedoms guaranteed under the First Amendment are, of course:

  • free exercise of religion,
  • freedom of speech,
  • freedom to assemble,
  • freedom of the press, and
  • freedom to petition the government

Furthermore, the survey found an interesting demographic breakdown among who remembered which freedoms:

There were also statistically significant demographic differences among those who could recall certain freedoms. For example, younger people (age 18–34) were more likely than older respondents to recall freedom of religion and the press. More educated, higher income respondents were more likely to recall freedom of speech, and more educated respondents were able to name more freedoms overall. Surprisingly, those with a religious identity were slightly less likely to be able to name freedom of religion (13%) than those who were not religious (17%).

While unfortunate, it’s unsurprising that younger, less educated Americans were less likely to recall freedom of speech as a First Amendment right. A growing number of young people – namely high school and college students – believe that “offensive” and “hate speech” should be censored, particularly on the internet. Interestingly, 60 percent of respondents making under $25,000 per year agreed that the government should require social media companies “to monitor and remove objectionable content from their sites,” including “hate speech,” “personal attacks,” and “false information.”

It seems, then, that America’s public education system is not only teaching young people to be intolerant of opposition, but also failing to adequately teach them about their rights to begin with.

Ann Gregory

Recent Posts

Family Man Ryan Gosling Picks Roles That Won’t Hurt His Children

The Hollywood star Ryan Gosling is speaking out this week to say that he keeps…

2 days ago

Jeff Daniels, Once Ready To Leave Show Business, Has Found His Groove

After Dumber and Dumber To finished filming in 2014, Jeff Daniels told co-star Jim Carrey,…

2 days ago

Britney Spears Announces She’s Leaving California – ‘I’m Moving To Boston’

The singer Britney Spears has revealed that she is the latest celebrity to be ditching…

2 days ago

Cher Once Lost All Her Money But Explains How She Bounced Back

Cher was once broke. But she was able to come back out of it, as…

2 days ago

Johnny Depp Praised For First Role After Amber Heard Trial

Johnny Depp has officially launched his Hollywood comeback in the wake of him coming out…

2 days ago

‘Beverly Hills, 90210’ Star Jason Priestley Reveals Why He Ditched L.A. For Nashville

The former "Beverly Hills, 90210" star Jason Priestley recently became the latest in a long…

2 days ago