Feminists up in Arms Over Adam Levine’s Bare Chest

Liberals were furious on Sunday night when Maroon 5 frontman Adam Levine refused to submit to their demands of making his halftime show political. In the two days since his apolitical performance, liberals have been bashing it every chance they get. Now, they have found a ridiculous new reason to attack Levine over the performance.

Daily Mail reported that liberals are up in arms over the fact that Levine stripped off his shirt, subsequently exposing his nipples during his halftime performance. Liberal feminists have been particularly angry, claiming that there is a double standard at play here, as Janet Jackson nearly had her career ruined when a wardrobe malfunction exposed her nipple during her 2004 Super Bowl halftime performance.

In the days since the Super Bowl, Twitter has exploded with liberals attacking Levine for daring to show his nipples.

I’m sorry but Adam Levine should get the same grief as Janet did for showing us his unclothed nipples; more specifically, this should prove how absurd, hypocritical, racist and sexist that puritanical hysteria over Janet’s boob really was.

— Reappropriate (@reappropriate) February 4, 2019

How come Adam Levine gets to show his nipples and Janet Jackson doesn’t

— Vivian Ho (@VivianHo) February 4, 2019

This country should have a serious chat about why Adam Levine’s nipples are, uh, apparently “acceptable” on TV but Janet Jackson was shamed and blacklisted for something she didn’t even do.#SuperBowl

— Charlotte Clymer?️‍? (@cmclymer) February 4, 2019

Adam Levine goes shirtless in a lackluster Super Bowl halftime show performance. There goes the double standard as years ago Janet Jackson’s career practically went down the drain after accidentally showing her nipple in a wardrobe malfunction. #SuperBowl #JusticeForJanet pic.twitter.com/3TF7rVaqRA

— RamonGinoChanJr (@RamonGinoChanJ1) February 4, 2019

Why are Adam Levine’s nipples fine for air, but 2004’s “wardrobe malfunction” made Janet Jackson a pariah for years? That’s the question some fans are asking after the #SuperBowl: https://t.co/X3faRZNY0m pic.twitter.com/xoCq0xKkhG

— CNN (@CNN) February 4, 2019

[totalpoll id=”145597″]

Here’s the real reason liberals are mad at Levine

Something tells me that if Levine had caved to liberal demands to either drop out of the halftime show or use it to take a knee in solidarity with Colin Kaepernick, we would not be hearing so much outrage over his nipples. Since liberals feel the need to make absolutely everything political these days, they were grossly offended when Levine chose to give a performance that focused on unity and bringing the American people together.

This non-political performance was so unforgivable to liberals that they have stirred up tons of fake outrage against Levine for daring to expose his nipples. Since there was nothing controversial about his performance at all, this was the best that the left could come up with in their quest to blacklist anyone who does not cave to their left-wing, race-baiting demands. How pathetic is that?